{"id":2370,"date":"2019-12-09T10:20:44","date_gmt":"2019-12-09T09:20:44","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/damianboeselager.org\/?p=2370"},"modified":"2023-08-25T09:59:21","modified_gmt":"2023-08-25T07:59:21","slug":"its-your-future","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/damianboeselager.org\/en\/its-your-future\/","title":{"rendered":"It’s your future!"},"content":{"rendered":"\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

As some of you might know, I am a member of the Committee on Constitutional Affairs.  Tonight, we will adopt a \u201cDraft opinion on the Conference on the Future of Europe<\/em>\u201d<\/a>, which will then be voted upon by all Parliamentarians next week in Strasbourg.<\/p>


<\/p>\n

But what is this Conference really about? Who is discussing the future of Europe, and how? And why does this \u2018opinion\u2019 matter at all?<\/p>


<\/p>\n

Ursula von der Leyen promised<\/a> to organise a conference on the future of Europe shortly before she was elected President of the European Commission. However, there is a lot of uncertainty regarding what this conference should be about. Interpretations seem to circle around it being a forum for citizens and EU institutions to work together in order to define the future of the continent, potentially even leading to a change in the treaties. Vague\u2026I know.<\/p>


<\/p>\n

Since there is so much uncertainty, multiple people in Parliament, the Commission and even in different member states (e.g., France and Germany) are trying to shape this idea according to what they believe makes the most sense \u2013 which means a lot of smaller drafts have already been produced.<\/p>


<\/p>\n

Now, the text we are preparing tonight in my committee (AFCO<\/a>) is also rather general and says that the European Parliament supports the idea of holding a conference on the future of Europe. And it outlines some key elements that this conference should entail. For me the most important ones are:<\/p>


<\/p>\n